On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 08:47:06PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 07/15/07 18:00, David Brodbeck wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> Why? Reply-to-mailing-list has been a feature of every mail client worth >>> using this decade. >> Well, if your definition of "mail clients worth using" doesn't include >> unmodified versions of Thunderbird, OS X Mail, Pine, or most webmail >> clients. In fact, the only mailers I know of that get this right out of >> the box are Elm and KMail, but I'm sure there are some I don't know about. > > Evolution has also done it for quite a while. sylpheed, claws-mail (former sylpheed-claws), mutt, balsa(?) >> I do appreciate the Thunderbird "reply-to-list" plugin, but it's got some >> serious user interface flaws, has an odd dependence on another plugin, and >> requires patching Thunderbird if the distribution I'm using hasn't done so >> already. It comes across more as a hack than an integrated feature. The fact that T-bird is popular doesn't make it automatically good, does it? Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature