[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Subject Confusion



David Brodbeck wrote in Article
<348A1659-5C02-4E8A-B0EE-D5211EB5FDC0@u.washington.edu> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:

> 
> On Jul 11, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:08:04PM +0100, andy baxter wrote:
>>>
>>> Incidentally, it would help me at least if the list software could
>>> set
>>> the 'reply-to' header to the list address.
>>>
>> Please.  Not this argument again.
>>
>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful
> 
> I think the arguments there make sense.
> 
> I think people who decry reply-to-munging forfeit their right to
> complain when people reply directly instead of to the list, though. ;)

Why?  Reply-to-mailing-list has been a feature of every mail client worth
using this decade.

-- 
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@ursine.ca




Reply to: