Re: Subject Confusion
David Brodbeck wrote in Article
<[🔎] 348A1659-5C02-4E8A-B0EE-D5211EB5FDC0@u.washington.edu> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
>
> On Jul 11, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:08:04PM +0100, andy baxter wrote:
>>>
>>> Incidentally, it would help me at least if the list software could
>>> set
>>> the 'reply-to' header to the list address.
>>>
>> Please. Not this argument again.
>>
>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful
>
> I think the arguments there make sense.
>
> I think people who decry reply-to-munging forfeit their right to
> complain when people reply directly instead of to the list, though. ;)
Why? Reply-to-mailing-list has been a feature of every mail client worth
using this decade.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@ursine.ca
Reply to: