On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:11:48AM +0200, Joe Hart wrote: > Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:37:47PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >> ~$ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.20-1-686 > >> linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: > >> Installed: 2.6.20-3 > >> Candidate: 2.6.20-3 > >> Version table: > >> *** 2.6.20-3 0 > >> 500 http://ftp.ro.debian.org sid/main Packages > >> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > >> > >> Strange thing is that linux-image-2.6-686 doesn't depend on it so I had > >> to select it specificaly. > > > > I wondered why all these people have been talking about 2.6.20 stuff > > when my up-to-date sid is still at .18. > > > > Is that a bug of l-i-2.6-*? > > > > Andrew, see my other message. It boils down to: I need 2.6.21 because > it fixes a timing issue that affects this computer. > that doesn't answer my question: Is it a bug of l-i-2.6-* that it doesn't depend on the latest kernel (i.e. 2.6.20-3). AIUI, that package should always depends on the latest 2.6 kernel, but apparently, it doesn't A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature