Re: linux-image-2.6-* dependency issues [was Re: Business card iso]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:11:48AM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:37:47PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>>>> ~$ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.20-1-686
>>>> linux-image-2.6.20-1-686:
>>>> Installed: 2.6.20-3
>>>> Candidate: 2.6.20-3
>>>> Version table:
>>>> *** 2.6.20-3 0
>>>> 500 http://ftp.ro.debian.org sid/main Packages
>>>> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>>>>
>>>> Strange thing is that linux-image-2.6-686 doesn't depend on it so I had
>>>> to select it specificaly.
>>> I wondered why all these people have been talking about 2.6.20 stuff
>>> when my up-to-date sid is still at .18.
>>>
>>> Is that a bug of l-i-2.6-*?
>>>
>> Andrew, see my other message. It boils down to: I need 2.6.21 because
>> it fixes a timing issue that affects this computer.
>>
>
> that doesn't answer my question:
>
> Is it a bug of l-i-2.6-* that it doesn't depend on the latest kernel
> (i.e. 2.6.20-3). AIUI, that package should always depends on the
> latest 2.6 kernel, but apparently, it doesn't
>
> A
I agree with you.
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGRWX+iXBCVWpc5J4RAjF9AKDHWRvkRMrSaMtQmduYIUbTJvBApACguzDp
g99jJrTdKHTBM4sBGDvbLUI=
=9hGJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: