Re: Fixed fonts in Debian
Spam detection software, running on the system "mouse.travisbsd.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
postmaster@travisbsd.org for details.
Content preview: On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 04:14:16PM -0400, Andrew J. Barr
wrote: > Isn't this Luxi Mono, which is actually provided by
ttf-xfree86-nonfree? > This my preferred monospace font as well. Ah,
that's exactly what I wanted! Thanks a lot for the suggestion! [...]
Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.1 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=kumar.appaiah%40gmail.com&ip=59.183.2.60&receiver=mouse.travisbsd.org]
-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
2.3 UNIQUE_WORDS BODY: Message body has many words used only once
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[59.183.2.60 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.9 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[59.183.2.60 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
1.9 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[59.183.2.60 listed in combined.njabl.org]
-3.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 04:14:16PM -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> Isn't this Luxi Mono, which is actually provided by ttf-xfree86-nonfree?
> This my preferred monospace font as well.
Ah, that's exactly what I wanted! Thanks a lot for the suggestion!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600036
--- End Message ---
Reply to: