Re: GPL v3?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:34:18AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:02 -0500, Robert D. Crawford wrote:
> > Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl> writes:
> >
> > > Greg Folkert wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:43 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > >>> Just for the fun of it, I'd be interested in a little poll:
> > >>> 1 - are you generally in favor or against the GPLv3?
> > >>
> > >> Yes.
> > >
> > > That answer says nothing. Analogy: Do you prefer chocolate or vanilla
> > > ice cream? Yes.
> >
> > Actually, the answer _does_ mean something. In programming terms, if a
> > is true or b is true then the whole statement returns true.
> >
> > It is a joke.
>
> Cool. someone got it. They were an *OR* statement. There should actually
> be 4 questions there.
>
If you are in favor of GPLv3 {
return 1;
}
elif you are against the GPLv3 {
return 0;
}
else {
break;
}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGE61u/o7Q/FCvPe0RAvupAJ4u6ur5j82zNGTDsD6gz6TpzpGZkACgnHnj
RQdDlU4kW4X6IjFL8WpIINs=
=hPRK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: