Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 04/02/2007 04:50 PM, Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 00:45 +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
>>> There have been a lot of talk and suggestions, for example,
>>> Joey Hess described Constantly Usable Testing, it sounds a
>>> bit like your suggestion.
>>> http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut.html
>> CUT was exactly what testing was supposed to be, in the
>> beginning. Period. It hasn't become that. It has gotten to the
>> point that sometimes testing is borkdened for long periods of
>> time... in small areas mind you, but still broken.
>
> CUT seems like it would be pretty much the same as I was thinking.
>
>> I think it would be good to have the Sidux group latch onto
>> this. They could really improve the whole process. It would
>> make Testing usable at any one moment.
>
> That sounds interesting. Sidux is currently tracking SID; are you
> proposing that Sidux track Testing instead? Or are you proposing
> that they could turn Sidux into a more stable version of SID? Can
> you use Debian repositories? Debian's repositories are one of the
> top selling points for me.
>
This point has already been answered in the Sidux forums. They have no
plans of tracking testing. Sidux = Sid.
Joe
- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGEjEfiXBCVWpc5J4RAiRbAKCdVkjLdEho6UmrpvWyviq2KDscdACeMJOk
klGllY9/xiuFYxshZrltCjI=
=1gD1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: