Alternatives to Dreamweaver (was: Re: Wine)
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote in Article
> <[🔎] e628adfd0703180245o4ed9f289m4b2ad04dbf6f1aba@mail.gmail.com> posted to
> gmane.linux.debian.user:
>
>
>> I friend of mine wants to run Dreamweaver, and I suggested wine. However
>> he had some problems (which I don't remember, and my friend is not here
>> right now). He runs Debian Unstable.
>>
>
> This friend knows that Dreamweaver does *not* produce web-suitable HTML,
> right? (If it doesn't pass http://validator.w3.org/, it's not
> web-suitable).
>
> (And are you really his friend for not suggesting something better than
> Dreamweaver?)
>
Please suggest something that would fit the bill, rather than just
saying "don't do that."
While I haven't used DW in many years (since I realized it has serious
vendor lock-in issues), I recognize that there is a need for 'regular
folks' to sometimes work on the Web. Last time I checked, the GNU/Linux
HTML editing/FTP programs were way off the mark for the 'regular
folks'. Have these programs gotten better over the past few years?
Reply to:
- References:
- Wine
- From: "José Sánchez" <josefer3000@gmail.com>
- Re: Wine
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Wine
- From: Mathias Brodala <info@noctus.net>
- Re: Wine
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Wine
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: Wine
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@connexer.com>
- Re: Wine
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: Wine
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Wine
- From: "Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto" <please.no.spam.here@gmail.com>
- Re: Wine
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>