Re: Dunk-Tank and the DD strike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-14-03 at 10:45 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>> What is this all about? I've been following d-u pretty closely
>> recently, and I haven't seen much DT discussion here.
>>
>> Celejar
>>
>
> Ideally, bridging the gap.
>
> Not that I've any inflated sense of my own importance, or
> ability to resolve the problem, but perhaps the most important
> thing Anthony Towns can do _before_ the election is to get the
> release process back on track.
>
> Most of us have been very patient, and have faith that etch will
> happen when it's ready. But, if the strike drags on into the new
> leaders term, then it's harmful.
>
> The right thing to do is to get back on track now.
>
> DU is perhaps the right place to start such a process: to guage
> the mood of the users as a whole and hopefully provide the
> necessary incentive - if one is needed - to move things forward.
>
> b.
Personally, I would prefer not to have a dunk-tank flame war showing up
in d-u, as it's a dev issue, not a user one.
I'm sure the user community is anxiously awaiting Etch, but the
consensus here is AFAIK, it'll be ready when it's ready and we will wait.
Joe
- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF+BxiiXBCVWpc5J4RAlKzAJ9NPbyhC8Td36lwxBT9aCvmhdlSEgCcCMJR
hI8EOHVAJqMvNSP4sIlW7c8=
=e70q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: