On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:35:07 -0600 Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com> wrote: [snip] > I agree. There is a tendency on the list to chastise topical questions > with "google for it" while OT threads go on for ever. BTW the list's > track record in actually answering and solving *topical* questions, in > my opinion, is 'C'. How should we grade? On a curve against other lists / fora? Some objective measure? Celejar