Ron Johnson wrote:
I'll have to take your word for the baselessness of those sites I reference... after all, I don't live there, so it *should* only peripherally affect me.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/25/07 23:53, Wulfy wrote:Ron Johnson wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1but then again, storing it in underground bunkers for thousands of years doesn't appear to be a much better solution.Sure it does.Oh, yeah. Leave it for later generation to clean up... very much better.Except, when it's sealed in a mountain, later generation won't see it...
As for the quote above, yes, they won't see it.. unless they start mining, or there's an earthquake or erosion... no-one can guarantee that that won't happen. Especially with the climate changes that are happening.
And no, I'm not suggesting that any other form of power generation is "better", they all have problems, but blatant "this is safe" arguments are... short-sighted.
-- Blessings Wulfmann Wulf Credo: Respect the elders. Teach the young. Co-operate with the pack. Play when you can. Hunt when you must. Rest in between. Share your affections. Voice your opinion. Leave your Mark.