Re: Boot logs ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:00:57 +0000 (GMT)
"s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca> wrote:
> > deb ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
> > deb-src ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free
> >
> > > ii) IFF that points to Etch/testing, have you done a dist-upgrade?
> >
> > It doesn't but I have done many update/dist-upgrades since the
> > installation.
>
> Welcome to testing (Etch), at least for the moment. As soon as Etch
> goes stable, that sources.list is set up to take you automatically to
> Lenny. You can forestall that (stay with Etch), if you wish, by
> replacing the string "testing" with "etch" now. Then you'll stay with
> Etch when it goes stable. I prefer to use the names. That lets me
> see what others run into in the upgrade before I jump. YMMV.
Yes I have done that already, along with the suggestion of keeping "testing"
on the security update line to ensure I get them!
> > switch to Debian I haven't booted it. But Debian is just different
> > enough from Ubuntu that I feel a bit lost at times.
>
> They are a bit of an odd crowd.
No disagreement here.
> Someone mentioned the other day the
> single greatest accomplishment of *buntu so far has been vacuuming the
> worst of the clueless noobs out of here and into *buntu.
There are days I feel like one....I wonder how many have come to Debian from
the forks. For me there are just too many unanswered questions in that crowd,
similar to Mepis. I think the attraction to Ubuntu is the bleeding edge
approach they are taking, but I wonder sometimes if they haven't bitten off
more than they can chew :)
> No, you
> don't appear to meet that specification at all so far. :-)
Nice to know :)
- --
Cheers
Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFwqig8Rvr3Tn207ARAp/mAJ97i3CidopIfmzTLEspXZOB9mDkqQCfQJyi
yEv2ZlqnvRwEL5Mb5Wq53y0=
=bw48
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: