Re: Debian, Iceweasle, Firefox!
Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Sunday 28 January 2007 18:33, Paul Johnson wrote:
> ...
>> > Do you see a difference?
>>
>> You could have cancelled and looked into why that is. iceweasel
>> provides firefox because it *is* firefox. There is no functional
>> difference between firefox and iceweasel. You're making a mountain
>> out of a molehill.
>
> Just what was taken out as non-free if it doesn't effect functionality?
> If it doesn't make a difference, why is it in there? Or have all the
> non-free things been replaced by free code already?
The name and the logos. Yes, it really was as trivial as that. Otherwise
Iceweasel and Firefox are identical.
Reply to: