On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 09:38:02PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote: > On Sunday 28 January 2007 18:33, Paul Johnson wrote: > ... > > > Do you see a difference? > > > > You could have cancelled and looked into why that is. iceweasel > > provides firefox because it *is* firefox. There is no functional > > difference between firefox and iceweasel. You're making a mountain > > out of a molehill. > > Here's the part I don't get. Even though I'm making a living as a > programmer, I'm self taught and have missed a lot -- and I don't know C > or C++. I've tried to make sense of the listing of what was taken out > of Firefox to make Iceweasel, yet I found it hard to follow. > > Just what was taken out as non-free if it doesn't effect functionality? > If it doesn't make a difference, why is it in there? Or have all the > non-free things been replaced by free code already? > Hi Hal, If you want the authoritative info on what the difference is between FF and IW, check this out: http://web.glandium.org/blog/?cat=7 cheers, Kev -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal |mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/| | `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and | | `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 | | my keysever: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature