On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:34:03PM +0000, Tyler wrote: > Max Hyre wrote: > > Tyler, you might want to try emacs-snapshot. I've been > >following it (and unstable) for months now, and have had no > >problems > > Thanks, that's very interesting. Having already manually installed the > manual directly from gnu.org I'm ok for now, but I will investigate this > for future installs. I'm still a little hesitant, since using the debian > repositories leaves me vulnerable to the GFDL policy of the moment. Does > anyone know if the policy is actually different for unstable, or is it > just a matter of the developers not having had time yet to remove the > docs in question? Hi Max and Tyler, as you mention, from my understanding, GFDL licensed document without invariant sections are DFSG free. And if a package has the GFDL documents with invariant sections, it would be a bug and should be reported. This affects etch (and beyond) and sid. The only thing I would like is for all packages that had thing removed to say so and say where you can get the missing parts wheather that is in the non-free debian repository or the original source. This may be done as I have not really investigated many packages and the documents in /usr/share/$PKG/. cheers, Kev -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal | debian.home.pipeline.com | | `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and | | `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 | | my keysever: pgp.mit.edu | my NPO: cfsg.org |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature