On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:30:37PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote: > > > Unless... they're not the maintainer of the repository. Sometimes you > have to use cvs, and some people prefer cvs. I think you're hard > pressed to justify using subversion over cvs either, since they're > mostly identically the same in functionality. > If by "equivalent in functionality" you really mean "subversion fixes nearly every shortcoming and offers many enhancements, including treating directories as first class objectsa dn maintaining version history for moved objects and directories, among other things", then yes, you are right own. The beauty of subversion is that it is a virtual drop in replacement for cvs and yet is so much more. > As for a cvs application, uhhh, I'll pick one : viewcvs is pretty nice. > I like ViewSVN > ;) > :-) > Angelo > Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature