[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

libgphoto2-2 (sarge->sid)

I am wondering how broken Sarge would become if I
allowed an unstable install of libgphoto2-2 to
  I changed the apt sources list from stable to
unstable.  Then ran apt-get update.  That took a
while.  Then I ran apt-get install libgphoto2-2.  It
spit out the following:
 The following extra packages will be installed:
   busybox fontconfig fontconfig-config klibc-utils
libc6 libc6-dev libcairo2
   libdbus-1-3 libdbus-glib-1-2 libexif12
libfontconfig1 libfreetype6
   libglib2.0-0 libgphoto2-port0 libhal-storage1
libhal1 libklibc libltdl3
   libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common libselinux1
libsepol1 libusb-0.1-4
   libvolume-id0 locales lsb-base makedev
module-init-tools tzdata
 Suggested packages:
   glibc-doc libfreetype6-dev ttf-thryomanes
ttf-baekmuk ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp
   ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp ttf-arphic-gkai00mp
 Recommended packages:
   dbus libglib2.0-data x-ttcidfont-conf
 The following packages will be REMOVED:
   base-config initrd-tools kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386
 The following NEW packages will be installed:
   busybox fontconfig-config klibc-utils libcairo2
libdbus-1-3 libdbus-glib-1-2
   libexif12 libhal-storage1 libhal1 libklibc libltdl3
libsepol1 libvolume-id0
   lsb-base tzdata
 The following packages will be upgraded:
   fontconfig libc6 libc6-dev libfontconfig1
libfreetype6 libglib2.0-0
   libgphoto2-2 libgphoto2-port0 libpango1.0-0
libpango1.0-common libselinux1
   libusb-0.1-4 locales makedev module-init-tools
 15 upgraded, 15 newly installed, 6 to remove and 821
not upgraded.
 Need to get 17.0MB of archives.

The part that really concerned me is the REMOVED:.  Is
this the actual Kernels being un-installed?  If so,
what's up with that?
  I said no I don't want to do this.  I changed the
sources list back to stable and ran apt-get update
  Would this have been OK to do?  I kind of doubt it.

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

Reply to: