Re: libgphoto2-2 (sarge->sid)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/26/06 20:04, Gregory Bushta wrote:
> I am wondering how broken Sarge would become if I
> allowed an unstable install of libgphoto2-2 to
> I changed the apt sources list from stable to
> unstable. Then ran apt-get update. That took a
> while. Then I ran apt-get install libgphoto2-2. It
> spit out the following:
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> busybox fontconfig fontconfig-config klibc-utils
> libc6 libc6-dev libcairo2
> libdbus-1-3 libdbus-glib-1-2 libexif12
> libusb-0.1-4 locales makedev module-init-tools
> 15 upgraded, 15 newly installed, 6 to remove and 821
> not upgraded.
> Need to get 17.0MB of archives.
> The part that really concerned me is the REMOVED:. Is
> this the actual Kernels being un-installed?
> If so,
> what's up with that?
Sid has a newer version of the kernel.
> I said no I don't want to do this. I changed the
> sources list back to stable and ran apt-get update
> Would this have been OK to do? I kind of doubt it.
Mixing Stable and Sid is *strongly* discouraged.
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----