Re: Dirty spam
On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:06, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Not directed solely at you, Mumia, just something that I've been
> meaning to say for weeks now. Know what would really help? If people
> would stop replying to spam, quoting spam or otherwise legitimizing spam to
> my bayesian filters. That has to be part of the reason the spam getting
> through both of my filters (SA and TB). I mean do I consider the replies
> to spam as ham or spam? If it's ham then it increases the chances of
> false-negatives in the future. If it's spam then it increases the chances
> of false-positives in the future. Either way I'm screwed and it seems that
> every spam to make it through the list is quoted a few times now. :/
Sorry, I did not mean to respam the spam.
Now I feel as though I need to find a special chewing gum.