Re: Dirty spam
On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:06, Steve Lamb wrote:
Not directed solely at you, Mumia, just something that I've been
meaning to say for weeks now. Know what would really help? If people
would stop replying to spam, quoting spam or otherwise legitimizing spam to
my bayesian filters. That has to be part of the reason the spam getting
through both of my filters (SA and TB). I mean do I consider the replies
to spam as ham or spam? If it's ham then it increases the chances of
false-negatives in the future. If it's spam then it increases the chances
of false-positives in the future. Either way I'm screwed and it seems that
every spam to make it through the list is quoted a few times now. :/
Sorry, I did not mean to respam the spam.
Now I feel as though I need to find a special chewing gum.
I'm sorry to ask. Can you explain what special chewing gum means?