On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:44:42AM -0700, Land Haj wrote: > If one is to believe top's over-all cpu report, sid and sarge are equal > when I run at 16 bit, but if one is to believe the info on single > processes, sarge is still very much lower. It sounds like the process accounting in the new sid kernel is a bit more accurate. I would tend to believe sid more than sarge in this respect. > All this is without dri though. Changing to 16 bit in sid doesn't make dri > work, and I don't have it working in sarge either. I am attaching log and > config from sarge. (The config is a sax generated one that I grapped from > the net and that I never bothered to alter as it seemed to work well > enough except for dri.) Your sarge X log file says that DRI is working. It may be lying though. Again, I would believe sid more than sarge in this respect too. What I need to help fix the DRI problem in sid though is your X log of a 16 bit X session in sid. Although I expect the problem to be the same as in 24 bit mode (ie. not enough video memory). > How much cpu load is normal when playing a movie using xine? My processor > is a 1GHz p3. That depends on (at least) three things, the X server, the media player and the movie file format and resolutions. So any kind of blanket statement is impossible to make. -- CJ van den Berg mailto:cj@vdbonline.com xmpp:cj@vdbonline.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature