[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: source code editor



On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 16:54:35 +0100, Digby Tarvin wrote:
[..]
>Since free implementaions of vi have become available, I have tended to
>stick to that on Unix systems unless I want to do something exotic like
>running complex macros that act on multiple files simultaneously. Vi is
>much easier to learn, especially if you are familiar with 'ed' syntax,
>but at 24Mb sounds like a heck of a lot of overhead has been added.
>Standard 'vi' on my BSD box is:
> skaro:/usr/home/digbyt> ls -l `which vi` 
> -r-xr-xr-x  3 bin  bin  225280 Jan 21  1997 /usr/bin/vi
>which still seems large to me.

On my Debian Sid:

 % ls -l /usr/bin/vim.full
 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1860324 2006-05-22 14:19 /usr/bin/vim.full
 % ls -l /usr/bin/vim.gnome
 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1673804 2006-05-22 14:19 /usr/bin/vim.gnome
 % ls -l /usr/bin/nvi
 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 359796 2006-05-27 00:13 /usr/bin/nvi

I am fairly sure that you can make VIM _a_lot_ smaller than that 'vim
--version' reveals that there are 88 features compiled in and only 11
left out.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                             (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org             Jabber: magnus.therning@gmail.com
http://therning.org/magnus

Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.

Finagle's Fifth Law:
Always draw your curves, then plot your readings.

Attachment: pgpKuIAs8oLHO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: