[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: switching from apt-get to aptitude



On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:59:26PM +0200, H. Wilmer wrote:
>Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
>> You cannot break anything
>>by using aptitude and apt-get together, but you will (partially)
>>neutralize many of the advantages of aptitude. Just think of aptitude as
>>a tool which integrates the functionality of apt-get, apt-cache, etc.
>>into one utility with an optional ncurses-GUI and a broader repertoire
>>for the resolution of dependency problems.
>
>Hm, I tried aptitude and found that you won't know what's going on
>anymore and that it tries to do things to packages you won't want it to
>do and that it's impossible to prevent that and very difficult, if not
>impossible, to make it install the packages you want. When using it
>after a fresh install, it appears to leave you with a totally broken
>system.
>
>In other words: Aptitude just utterly sucked, so I went back to dselect.

This is exactly what I thought (althogh I never got along with dselect
either) so I always went back to apt-get+debfoster. Recently debfoster
was deprecated and I was more or less forced to take a look at aptitude.
So far my experience is that it IS good, though it takes a little while
to get used to it and figure out the UI. After getting some help from
this very list I'm now using aptitude in a manner very similar to how I
previously used apt-get+debfoster. I wrote some stuff down so that I
would remember[1].

/M

1. http://therning.org/magnus/archives/132

-- 
Magnus Therning                    (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus

Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting different results.
     -- Albert Einstein

Attachment: pgpHiIHBhUD4C.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: