Re: Proposed change for subscriptions...
hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:05:24PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Sunday 12 March 2006 14:44, Steve Lamb wrote:
But the fact that you see an error and work to correct it is good. You
have a good point here, and it is important that the point you are
making is not overshadowed by anything else. Just as with Anand's
responses. What he says would stand better on its own if it were not
attached to comments like threats to unsubscribe you and, "If you don't
like it, leave."
Here's what he said. I see no threat.
* Nothing is going to change, so if you aren't happy with the setup of
* debian-user then it probably isn't the list for you and you should
* consider unsubscribing.
Well, I dunno about that. I've been speaking English since I was
three years old, and that looks like an implicit threat to me.
Also, you noticed, there was also an *explicit* threat made,
and also action taken (list delay).
To me, yes it was a threat. Further, given the explicit threat,
and the later action, I think my opinion is justified.
[snip]
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
Reply to: