Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:21:09 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060111112109.738fe673.andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43C55622.5040303@ix.netcom.com>
References: <[🔎] 20060111142805.GA5531@topoi.pooq.com> <[🔎] 87d5iywwx5.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 20060111102633.6dad9780.andrew@farwestbilliards.com> <[🔎] 43C55622.5040303@ix.netcom.com>

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:01:54 -0500
Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Also, archive your debian box, then reformat and run windows
> until this issue is settled.
> 

I've been looking for an excuse to do just that. Windows is clearly a superior operating system. And now that "all out FAT belong to them" there is no need to look back </humor>

A
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>

Reply to:

References:
- FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
  - From: hendrik@topoi.pooq.com
- Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
- Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
  - From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>
- Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
  - From: Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice: No Such Device
Next by Date: Re: Problem with kdm 3.5 not starting
Previous by thread: Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
Next by thread: Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread