Re: sarge: the worst distro?

["a joe" <null2004@hotmail.com>]

i don't use gnome or kde, i use twm and plan to use fvwm. i am happy with 
mozilla, i take no interest in firefox or others and they don't seem to 
support Java. i re-installed woody and use netscape which has java support

one of best things about debian is well-defined packages, i mean it use 
little disk, perhaps it save most disk space among major distros. i don't 
use kde or gnome because they take big disk space without adding value to 
me.

i download  1st CD and  burn to CD-RW, so no loss


> From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net>
> To: a joe <null2004@hotmail.com>
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: sarge: the worst distro?
> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 18:42:30 -0400
>
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:37:14PM +0000, a joe wrote:
> > i have used Debian 1.2, 2.0, 2.1, potato and woody. with each new 
> version come
> > some new features that i found useful.
> >
> > a few days ago i installed sarge and found it the worst Debian distro 
> because
> > no new features is valuable to me.
>
> Wow.  You have a real strange sense of what constitutes a feature.  Two
> completely upgraded major desktop environments and a number of upgraded
> minor desktop environments and support for a host of new applications
> like Firefox, Thunderbird, Apache2, OpenOffice.org, and so on, are just
> a small fraction of what has changed.
>
> In any case, just send the CDs back with the receipt and original proof
> of purchase.  I am sure the Debian project will happily refund you 1000%
> percent of the purchase price.
>
> -Roberto
>
> --
> Roberto C. Sanchez
> http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto


> << attach3 >>

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963