Re: Gaim lost spell check
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:14:20AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> gaim.sourceforge.net. I also use checkinstall to create & install the
> debs.
Well, that's cool. I just installed 1.5.0 using checkinstall.
gaim 1.5.0
Build Protocol Plugins........ : yes
Protocols to link statically.. :
Protocols to build dynamically : gg irc jabber msn napster novell oscar yahoo zephyr
UI Library.................... : GTK 2.x
SSL Library/Libraries......... : None
Build with Plugin support..... : yes
Build with Perl support....... : yes
Build with Tcl support........ : no
Build with Tk support......... : no
Build with Audio support...... : yes
Build with NAS support........ : no
Build with GtkSpell support... : yes
Use kerberos 4 with zephyr.... : no
Use external libzephyr........ : no
Use XScreenSaver Extension.... : no
Use X Session Management...... : yes
Use startup notification.......: no
Print debugging messages...... : no
Still no spell check in IRC and no options to set it.
$ fgrep spell .gaim/prefs.xml
<pref name='spellcheck' type='bool' value='1' />
Humph!
BTW - checkinstall.
Nice tool. It would be nice to have that linked into
perl -MCPAN intall Foo:Baz
My poor system is a mix of debian perl packages, packages I've created
with whatever tool that is to build packages form CPAN, and modules
installed with CPAN.
> The current gaim maintainer was a weird numbering scheme, and it plays
> havoc when I install on my own. He adds the "1:" before the real
> release number.
Years of using Debian and packaging is still a mystery to me!
I have a laptop with it's package system hosed right now and I can't
seem to get it working again.
Preconfiguring packages ...
dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/available' near line 1:
EOF after field name `'
dpkg: --compare-versions takes three arguments: <version> <relation> <version>
...
Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover:
dpkg: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/available' near line 1:
EOF after field name `'
Ah, but that's another topic.
--
Bill Moseley
moseley@hank.org
Reply to: