Gregory Seidman writes: > Actually, I'm pretty happy with minicom. Are you unhappy merely > because it was written in the 90s? Or because it is text-based (as is > its purpose, after all)? As Unix-like-system afficionados, we can't afford to get uppity about what decade our software was designed and implemented in. :) Like Gregory, I find minicom entirely sufficient. In fact I very nearly like it.