Re: Making spamassassin nice?
On 7/25/05, David Baron <d_baron@012.net.il> wrote:
> Thanks. /etc/default/spamassassin has limits on child processes and nicelevel
> as well.
Can anyone report on what sort of resources are needed to run
spamassassin adequately? Since the upgrade to sarge, SA has totally
killed our virtual machine. We have the lowest-tier bytemark VM (64MB
mem). With a prefork limit of four processes and maximum nice, spamd
still brings it to its knees. How does dspam compare in resources
usage terms?
Reply to: