[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: guidelines to post on debian-user --- draft 1



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I just read the guidelines at
http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html
and have one question.  I understand the general concept of inline posting,
which is what you are advocating in this document, (not to be confused with
bottom-posting, quoting the entire message and posting at the bottom, as I
understand it).  But is it OK to simply reply to a message if your reply states
the context clearly enough without quoting?  My mail reader is threaded, and
keeps everything in conversation form, so as I am reading messages, I would
rather not look at the same stuff I have seen 15 times already.  In addressing
multiple points one-by-one, this could be useful, but I see a lot of messages
either completely bottom-posted because the user just knows "Don't top-post" or
messages that have quotes nested 4 or even 5 levels deep.  As long as the thread
remains unbroken, this should be unnecessary, since those of us with threaded
mail readers have already seen the top-most message 4 or 5 times.  I would
suggest that something be added concerning multilevel quoting.  And I hope no
one minds that I haven't quoted anything at all in this post since I have
hopefully made my point contextual enough to stand on its own.  Let me know if
not. ;-)

Lorenzo
- -- 
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s:+ a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W++ N o K- w---
O M V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5+ X+ R tv-- b++ DI-- D+
G e* h---- r+++ y+++
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC39TUG9IpekrhBfIRAn54AKCSZJFRcg0dpgUL9oCzAumxvEhOJwCgp/TM
3BexRTEnwLY2F4kLwwXCOr0=
=oEqW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: