Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
Version tracking isn't important to me. I dont get it why i should need
the deb either. And I don't like that the deb symlinks the kernel as
the default. What if the kernel fails? Isn't it good then to have
another one in the Grub menu?
On 5/4/05, Tim Kelley <email@example.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:05:01AM +0300, Andres J?rv wrote:
> I'm missing the point of make-kpkg. It doesn't make any other difference
> than make things more complicated IMHO. I just use the old fashion way of cp
> and make modules_install ;)
? It doesn't take any longer, and you get version tracking and a nice
deb. Seems like a no brainer to me. It's much more convenient than cp
and editing your bootloader files ...
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \
( t | i | m | @ | i | t | . | k | p | t | . | c | c )
\_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
GPG key fingerprint = 1DEE CD9B 4808 F608 FBBF DC21 2807 D7D3 09CA 85BF
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact