[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ~/.bashrc problem



2005/4/15, Robert Vangel <robert@vangelr.net.au>:
> Using " should work, or if you want a literal " you would use \" but
> this would break it...

Using " works most of the time, but, if you encouter some URL like 
http://bbs.ustc.edu.cn/cgi/sf?bid=260&aof=M425dea7e&fn=23.jpg
It does not work properly.

$ header http://bbs.ustc.edu.cn/cgi/sf?bid=260&aof=M425dea7e&fn=23.jpg
--18:07:28--  http://bbs.ustc.edu.cn/cgi/sf?bid=260
           => `/dev/null'
Resolving bbs.ustc.edu.cn... [1] 17002
[2] 17004
[2]   Done                    aof=M425dea7e

Connecting to bbs.ustc.edu.cn[202.38.64.3]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
 2 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:07:28 GMT
 3 Server: Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) Debian GNU/Linux
 4 Connection: close
 5 Content-Type: application/x-executable

    [ <=>                                 ] 20            --.--K/s
18:07:28 (195.31 KB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [20]
[1]+  Done                    header http://bbs.ustc.edu.cn/cgi/sf?bid=260

If I use wget directly with the single quotes around the URL, you can
see the differece easily:

$ wget -O /dev/null -S
'http://bbs.ustc.edu.cn/cgi/sf?bid=260&aof=M425dea7e&fn=23.jpg'
--18:10:45--  http://bbs.ustc.edu.cn/cgi/sf?bid=260&aof=M425dea7e&fn=23.jpg
           => `/dev/null'
Resolving bbs.ustc.edu.cn... 202.38.64.3
Connecting to bbs.ustc.edu.cn[202.38.64.3]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
 2 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:10:45 GMT
 3 Server: Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) Debian GNU/Linux
 4 Accept-Ranges: bytes
 5 Connection: close
 6 Content-Disposition: inline;filename=23.jpg
 7 Last-Modified: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
 8 Content-Length: 280435
 9 Content-Type: image/jpeg

100%[====================================>] 280,435       --.--K/s

Last-modified header invalid -- time-stamp ignored.
18:10:45 (7.96 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [280435/280435]

-- 
Best regards,

James He



Reply to: