[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A question about /srv partition



Thanks, Dave:)

On Apr 2, 2005 1:24 PM, Dave Ewart <davee@sungate.co.uk> wrote:
> On Saturday, 02.04.2005 at 12:21 -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> 
> > > Of course, I have /boot, /home, /opt, /tmp, /usr, /usr/local, /var
> > > all on their own partitions.
> >
> > Of course?  Wow, that is a lot of partitions.  Do you find yourself
> > having to repartition a lot?
> 
> Yeah, partitioning is always hard to advise on, because it depends on
> what you need.
> 
> /boot is required with some systems, BIOSes or disks, but is not
> required at all on many systems
> 
> /home is nearly always a good idea, unless the server will not have any
> real users (i.e. it's just a web server or something like that: just
> running services).  Usually you will want /home to survive a reinstall.
> 
> /opt is probably pointless, unless you are building software yourself to
> put there.  Debian will never use this.
> 
> /tmp is sometimes useful if you have a lot of users creating temporary
> files, as it stops the root partition filling up
> 
> /usr is not normally required on a separate partition, although you can
> sometimes share /usr across multiple systems if you do
> 
> /usr/local: similar to /opt, in that you put stuff you build yourself
> there and it can survive a reinstall
> 
> /var is usually worth keeping separate, so that root doesn't fill up
> completely
> 
> In summary, It Depends.
> 
> Dave.
> --
> Please don't CC me on list messages!
> ...
> Dave Ewart - davee@sungate.co.uk - jabber: davee@jabber.org
> All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/
> Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Junpei Xia



Reply to: