[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xsane stopped working after upgrade (Sid)



On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:00 +0000, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 09 Feb 2005, Andreas Rippl wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:29:47AM +0000, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > xsane has been working well here for many months with my Epson
> > > Perfection 1650. Following a recent upgrade via Sid it now crashes.
> > > 
> > > In detail, it  initially recognizes the scanner and starts to scan but
> > > then hangs. I therefore kill the running xsane and try again. Now it
> > > says it can't find the scanner. However, if I unplug the scanner and
> > > replug it (Google suggestion), we sometimes get back to the starting
> > > point but again it locks up.
> > > 
> > > Results of sane-find-scanner:
> > > 
> > > "found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8, product=0x0110) at libusb:001:006"
> > > 
> > > Contents of /etc/sane.d/epson.conf:
> > > --------------------------
> > > # epson.conf
> > > #
> > > # here are some examples for how to configure the EPSON backend
> > > #
> > > # SCSI scanner:
> > > # scsi EPSON
> > > #
> > > # Parallel port scanner:
> > > #pio 0x278
> > > #pio 0x378
> > > #pio 0x3BC
> > > #
> > > # USB scanner - only enable this if you have an EPSON scanner. It could
> > > #               otherwise block your non-EPSON scanner from being 
> > > #               recognized.
> > > #		Depending on your distribution, you may need either the
> > > #		first or the second entry.
> > > usb
> > > #usb /dev/usbscanner0
> > > usb /dev/usb/scanner0
> > > usb 0x4b8 0x110
> > > --------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > This is with Debian kernel 2.6.10-1-686 #1
> > > 
> > > I've reported this as a bug. Any suggestions?
> > > 
> > > Anthony
> > > 
> > Hi Anthony,
> > 
> > I had a similar problem with a another USB scanner, and for me it helped 
> > to remove the 'usb /dev/usb/scanner0' line (from hp.conf in my case),
> > as this is used used for the kernel module. As you use libusb however,
> > you don't need it, but only the line below (usb 0x4b8 0x110). I am 
> > doubtful if that's the solution to your problem however, as you say that
> > the scanner starts out working correctly...
> > 
> > Also, the output of scanimage -L is correct? The access rights? There is
> > a group called scanner, which I put the users in as well.
> > 
> > Andreas
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the reply. No, it doesn't work for me. The first time I run
> xsane everything seems to go as expected except that no picture appears.
> Then I have to repower the scanner to get it recognized again. It
> therefore seems as if the problem is in processing the output from the
> scanner, rather than in getting it to run.
> 
> Both scanimage -L and sane-find-scanner show the scanner is there, and
> so does cat /proc/bus/usb/devices.
> 
> Google shows some people with similar problems (different scanners) but
> no obvious solutions. I'm beginning to wonder if it is a hardware
> problem of some sort, for the following reasons:
> 
> 	1. It developed in a system which was working previously.
> 	2. I reverted to the previous version of xsane, but no help.
> 	3. I tried 3 different kernels: no help.
> 	
> But my laptop (almost identical setup) does work with the scanner, so it
> seems unlikely that it has developed a fault. I'm completely floored by
> this.

I too, have been ticked off by this one. It is affecting my ability to
do business. I even tried my HP ScanJet 6390C usb-scanner, I still have.
It to is screwed. I borrowed a friends UMAX 3400 usb-scanner too, yep
borked!

I was working for 15 days with my new Epson RX600. Printing still works
JUST FINE, but scanning *IS HOSED*.

I reverted... to the revision I had when I installed the scanner. No
joy. Something else is bad. I also purged (all printing and scanning
software) restarted the machine from COLD (printer/scanner) and
computer. The re-installed, no joy.

Maybe we should look at the packages, seems libusb was compiled on Feb
2, 2005. That is the right amount of time for it to get through
incoming...etc

Yep, Libusb-0.1-4 v1:0.1.9-2 is the culprit. Revert to the version in
Sarge, by going to http://packages.debian.org/testing/libs/libusb-0.1-4

And downloading for your architecture.
-- 
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net

The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster:  Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: