Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> fast for lookups). Like XFS and JFS, ReiserFS also good when you don't
> want to have to pre-allocate inodes.
xfs et.al. is a good thing for 200GB or 2TB partitions
> However, ReiserFS doesn't offer anything but metadata journaling, and
> can bog down on parititions with a lot of write I/O because of tree
> rebalancing. Subjectively, it seems faster than ext2/ext3 on reads, but
> I'm sure someone has actually benchmarked this if you want real numbers.
some real numbers ..
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/FS/#Comp
c ya
alvin
Reply to: