Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2005 05:02 AM, Jan Meijer wrote:
> So if there's anyone out there with experience with either ReiserFS4 or
> XFS with Sarge I'd love to hear it.
frist, ext3 has ACLs: just put this in the mount options: user_xattr,acl
you have a desktop system with one harddisk?
take ext3. ext3 is reliable, and doesn't hickup when there is a badblock
. XFS, ReiserFS, etc are high end journaling systems, they all are good,
but they are designed to run on raid, where you don't see HW errors
because the raid below handles them.
If you say you have a server, then you can use all those (depeding on
what the partition is used I'd recommend xfs or reiser).
ext3 und xfs are the best at the moment, they have
- - acls
- - quota
reiserfs (at least on 2.6.8 kernels) doesn't have quota. Furthermore I
wouldn't put reiser on any externl/etc hd. all those should be ext3
(Because it allows more damage than others without getting broken).
- --
[ Clemens Schwaighofer -----=====:::::~ ]
[ TBWA\ && TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group ]
[ 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ]
[ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ]
[ http://www.tequila.co.jp http://www.tbwajapan.co.jp ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCCxf4jBz/yQjBxz8RAvjcAKDGu+oEDx1hy+d1bdhFMEFo/d5u1gCglMzJ
EadkoWg8QjUfbyj6fF5Oa9M=
=MwWp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: