On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:04 -0500, Travis Crump wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 23:43 -0500, Travis Crump wrote: > > > >>Ron Johnson wrote: > >> > >>>On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 20:59 -0500, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I know, this has to be a really dumb question. I must be > >>>>missing something really simple on this one. I want to point > >>>>out that googled up and down but must be asking google the > >>>>wrong thing. > >>> > >>>[snip] [snip] > > . is all that is necessary for an immediate attack. For sabotage, > > though, ~/bin would be better suited. > > > > But if the saboteur can put something in ~/bin couldn't he at the same > time edit ~/.bashrc et al and add ~/bin to the user's path himself? > > Genuinely curious. You got a point there. See, never let it be said that no one on d-u can admit when they are wrong... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "Would you mind not firing on the thermonuclear weapons?" A great line, from a *great* movie: Broken Arrow
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part