Re: Broken Konqueror?
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 05:39:19AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:39:40AM +0000, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> > To explain, konqi doesn't support http, kde does. You need a package called
> > something like the kdebase-kio-plugins package to get http support.
> So why isn't it a dependency?
I'm certain it is. I have performed 'apt-get install konqueror' on a
bare system and had a fully functioning web browser afterwards, under
sarge and sid.
> > Remember, konqi isn't a web browser.
> Yes it is. What do you mean?
I think he means, it isn't exclusively a web browser, or perhaps
primarily a web browser.