[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Sarge
To
:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: Sarge
From
: YH <
yh@paradise.net.nz
>
Date
: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:07:21 +1300
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
41D9D029.4090402@paradise.net.nz
>
Reply-to
:
yh@paradise.net.nz
In-reply-to
: <41D572D3.109@verizon.net>
References
: <41D54E1F.3040908@tacocat.net> <a25b91ba04123105262b854956@mail.gmail.com> <41D55B06.1080506@tacocat.net> <7d54402404123106322258eea7@mail.gmail.com> <41D572D3.109@verizon.net>
Hi,
Is sarge stable to install? I want to use 2.6 kernel, either I can
upgrade kernel from woody or re-install completely from Sarge, which one
is better?
Thanks and please CC my email address. YH
Reply to:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
YH (on-list)
YH (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Sarge
From:
Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
Re: Sarge
From:
Kent West <westk@acu.edu>
Prev by Date:
Re: "best" high performance video card for debian
Next by Date:
cd burning oddities
Previous by thread:
Re: "best" high performance video card for debian
Next by thread:
Re: Sarge
Index(es):
Date
Thread