Re: Linux Functionality?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Linux Functionality?
- From: Seeker5528 <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:14:45 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20050102011445.590529ae@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <20041227010546.GA27238@nitpicking.com>
- References: <200412252033.51093.Howland@priss.com> <20041226054603.GC1799@bart.local> <20041226155002.GA1673@nitpicking.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20041227010546.GA27238@nitpicking.com>
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 20:05:46 -0500
Carl Fink <email@example.com> wrote:
> Without taking up the issue of "my mailer is better than Outlook" (of
> course it is) XP's filesystem permissions *also* limit damage to
> user-owned files.
People running with administrator rights has already been covered, but what about people who create limited user accounts and fail to make the files private?
Would I be correct to think damage would be limited to user owned files, but not to files owned by a specific user?