Re: limiting resources
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 11:51, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Dominique Dumont <email@example.com>
> > > I forgot to mention that spamc is of course being used. However,
> > > spamc does not provide the means to strip markup from email
> > > messages, nor can it report to razor. My users don't need
> > > spamassassin for spam checking, but for spam processing.
> > Have you tried the '-m' switch on spamd ?
> Sure. As I said, spamd is not the problem. It's users executing
> <resource-intensive-app> multiple times, with the last time being
> spamassassin that almost killed the system.
> > You may need to use perl5.8.x to avoid signal handling bugs
> > mentionned in spamd man page. See "PERL_SIGNALS" in perlrun and
> > "Deferred Signals (Safe Signals)" in perlipc for details.
> All being done here.
Back in 2002 I asked on lkml a question similar to yours
Van Riel mentioned his fairsched <http://surriel.com/patches/>, but it
looks like it's not been ported to recent kernels.
Marc-Christian Petersen pointed me to another patch
<http://www.tls-technologies.com/CPU/cpu-intro.html>. But again, it's
not been ported to recent kernels, it seems.
Frederik Dannemare | mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8