Re: Getmail version 4 + spamassassin + procmail
That's difficult to believe. I've been using it for years with no
problems.
Good for you. I did too, but then started losing mail in part due to
resource problems. I heard good things of getmail, tried it and liked it.
You don't need to create any folders. procmail handles this by itself
when something arrives for that folder. I rm empty folders as my
rules evolve and I've had no problems.
Fair enough, I am no expert. I just thought someone might benefit from
my experiences with the things I struggled with.
Why does your procmailrc deliver to folders like ".blah"? What's the
dot for? Or is that a maildir vs. mbox thing?
I believe it's a Maildir/Courier thing. For mutt to know about the
folders I have to put in symlinks from blah/ to .blah/
What?!? If getmail.cron is a script, you don't need the redirection
to crontab. Just run it.
getmail.cron is a line dumped from my crontab. I corrected myself in my
next post, the redirection is indeed unnecessary, but you do need to run
'crontab getmail.cron' as far as I know, (I've not used cron much and
this seemed like the easiest way to enable/disable my mail checking)
* ^List-Id:.*sb\.mailman\.lug\.org\.uk
.SBLug/
Thanks.
:0
./
That should be unnecessary. Anything not matched by previous recipes
will fall into ${DEFAULT} (or is this another maildir/mbox thing?).
OK, I don't know about that. I don't spend too long on this stuff and it
works for me. I was in no way claiming to be an authority, and your
response has taught me a couple of things.
--
Joe Wrigley
Clockwork Software Systems
intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)
Reply to: