[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how to connect two PC's with a cross-over ethernet cable?



On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 17:54, Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
> Bram Mertens <bram-mertens@linux.be> wrote:
> > Don't I need a second ethernet card in my desktop when I buy a switch in
> > stead of a router?  When I'm going to buy new hardware I would like to
> > be able to 'share' my internet connection between the two computers and
> > have a permanent LAN.
> There are two possible setups:
> 
> 1.) Buy another ethernetcard and set up the Desktop as Router (NAT),
> this is the cheapest soloution (~ EUR 7).
> 
>         PPP            +-------+         LAN           +------+
> Modem ----------- eth0 |Desktop| eth1 ----------- eth0 |Laptop|
>                        +-------+                       +------+ 

This is what I considered in the first place except that I am
considering to make the connection between the laptop and the desktop
wireless.  The laptop has a built-in WLAN card (Prism 802.11g).  However
I am still uncertain about the performance I should expect, between the
room where my desktop is placed and the room I (want to) use the laptop
mostly is my kitchen, and I have read in several places that the
performance of a wireless connection will drop dramatically when the
signal has to pass through several walls and even more when the signals
passes near a microwave-oven.  Unfortunately this is exactly the case in
my apartment.

> 2.) Buy a hub/switch (~ EUR 20+) connect everything to the switch and 
> 2.1) either setup the Desktop as Router like above or
> 2.2) open seperatly PPP connection from the Desktop and Notebook
> 
>                   +------+              +-------+
> Modem ----------- |Switch| ------------ |Desktop|
>                   +------+              +-------+
>                      |
> 		     |
> 		     |
> 		     |
>                   +------+
>                   |Laptop|
> 		  +------+
> 
> 
> Of course the second methode is more flexible if more Computers are
> likely to be connected in the future.

Solution 2.2 is more flexible, but doesn't it require two IP-adressess
from the ISP?  If so this option isn't suitable for me without getting a
more expensive contract with my ISP.

Thanks for the explanation!

Bram
-- 
# Mertens Bram "M8ram"   <bram-mertens@linux.be>   Linux User #349737 #
# SuSE Linux 8.2 (i586)     kernel 2.4.20-4GB      i686     512MB RAM #
#  7:30pm  up 14 days  9:20,  11 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 #



Reply to: