Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> Too bad I haven't found a filter program that comes anywhere close to
> approaching the simplicity of tmda. The rules are *so freaking easy* to
> implement. This is a good thing.
What about Exim's own filtering? I find that rather easy to implement yet
retaining quite a bit of power. What I've seen of TMDA's filtering it is a
tiny bit simpler but nowhere near as powerful. At least it isn't the
Bernstienesque Procmail. *shudder*
> I don't use c/r, but I do use tmda's pending-message mechanism. Instead
> of challenging questionable messages, I "hold" them, which is an option
> allowing me to leave them in the queue till I feel like dealing with
> them.
How does this differ than having them filtered into a folder for later
perusal. I do that here. Anything high enough to be marked as spam but not
so high it is rejected is filtered into a folder and I look at it when I'm
good and ready.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature