Re: Another "testing" vs "unstable" question
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 17:00, Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> Unstable: "parts are frequently broken but quickly fixed"
>
> Testing: "parts are broken less often, but when they are, it can take
> months to fix them"
>
> Stable: "nothing is broken, but you won't be able to play with the
> latest gizmos unless you install from backports or source"
>
> Choose your poison. Note that the use of the term "frequently" in my
> description of unstable is relative; I've run unstable for years and
> had far fewer problems with it than I used to have with RedHat.
Interesting -- thanks!
Reply to: