Michael Satterwhite wrote:
I'm not sure where Monique went wrong. I'd have to agree with her assessment. Others in the thread have already praised the usability of unstable; Monique is just reiterating that if he really wants stable, he'll need to stick with stable and the older packages there. It might have sounded a bit short, but from my past experience with her, I don't think that was intended; it's just the nature of email.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 21 June 2004 12:03, Monique Y. Mudama wrote:If you're trying to avoid any downtime or difficulty whatsoever, run stable and live with the age of the packages.Not exactly promoting Debian, are we? Especially in a Linux world where there are so MANY choices.Others here, however, are doing a much better job.
-- Kent