Re: SA going downhill
On 16 Jun 2004, Antony wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using spamassassin 2.63 in unstable. In the last month or two, much
> more spam seems to get through. Here's an example:
>
> >From fetchmail Wed Jun 16 11:36:56 2004
> Return-path: <caxdjtjjuotcud@centrum.cz>
> Envelope-to: antony@antgel.co.uk
> Received: from 66.179.181.35 [66.179.181.35]
> by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5)
> for antgel@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:36:56
> +0100 (BST)
[snip]
For many months now I've been using spamprobe, which I find better than
spamassassin. Easy to set up and not more than one or two false
negatives a day; no false positives at all. I don't know why spamprobe
receives less publicity than the compettion but it's better than all the
others I've tried. There's a good mailling list to which the author
contributes frequently.
There is a deb but I generally compile from source and put it in
/usr/local.
Anthony
--
ac@acampbell.org.uk || http://www.acampbell.org.uk
using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic
Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles
Reply to: