[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Pros/Cons Kde vs Gnome?



On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 07:29:13AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:41:27PM +1000, Tim Connors wrote:
> > Hendrik Boom <hendrik@pooq.com> said on Sat, 19 Jun 2004 08:10:59 -0400:
> > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:31:33PM +1000, Tim Connors wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > If the only process running is the idle process, doing hlt()
> > > > instructions in a loop, then there are bugger all transistors doing
> > > > anything, so less power gets consumed.
> > > > 
> > > > AFAIK, all modern i386 (AMD, Intel, etc) CPUs at least have a htl()
> > > > instruction.
> > > 
> > > I run a dual-boot Debian/Windows ME system.  It overheats when running
> > > Windows, but not when running Debian.  Ny tech told me that's because
> > > Windows ME idles in a wait loop, but Linux uses a halt instruction.
> > 
> > Jeez, I thought they had fixed that by 98SE or so. Must not have...
> 
> Well, to be fair, my computer runs hotter playing video games in Linux 
> than it does in XP, and it's not getting higher framerates.
> 
> Many times when it's hot in the room and XP will be just below the 
> threshold with the CPU fan turned all the way up, similar tasks in Linux 
> will require the box fan.
> 
> Obviously this is because the Linux kernel is using the processor more 
> intensively.  As we see in the case of Windows ME burning through a wait 
> loop, that doesn't necessarily mean it's getting more work done.
> 
> The extra heat Linux seems to generate makes me suspect the kernel is 
> less efficient.  It doesn't perform higher i/o or more work.
> 

Do you have frequency scaling on your cpu? if so windows will activate
it by default if you are not fully loading you cpu, linux requires
appropriate daemons to do that.

> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
>  
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
>  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> 



Reply to: