Re: ghostscript woes
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 04:49:27PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:17:34PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> > Hi group,
> > Since more than a week now, gv doesn't anti-alias my postscript files as
> > beautifully as before: it uses less grays and more black. If I view my
> > LaTeX generated dvi files they look just as beautiful as they ever did.
> View the dvi files in what? converted to ps first, or via advi/kdvi?
> If you look in 'ghostscript' options in gv, what do you find for the
> antialias device? I presume that under gv options, anti alias is still
> selected. Here's what my three ps programs give me:
> gv -dNOPLATFONTS -sDEVICE=x11alpha
> ggv -dNOPLATFONTS -sDEVICE=x11alpha
> kghostview -sDEVICE=x11 -dTextAlphaBits=4 -dGraphicsAlphaBits=2 \
> -sDEVICE is still a legal option; x11 and x11alpha are both listed as
> available devices with --help... here are my package versions:
> ii gs-gpl 8.01-2 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript...
> ii gv 3.5.8-31 A PostScript and PDF viewer for X...
> ii gnome-gv 2.4.1-2 GNOME PostScript viewer...
> ii kghostview 3.2.2-1 PostScript viewer for KDE...
> > This is irritating, since I use gv a lot. Since ggv also suffers from
> > this problem, I think it is actually ghostscript which causes it.
> Most likely.
> > Furthermore, ps2epsi no longer resizes the bounding box of my graphics,
> > while eps2eps somehow turns my scalable LaTeX fonts in bitmaps. Why?
> No clue here...
> > gv doesn't seem to be able to render a lot of pdfs from the net
> > correctly these days. Since I never required acrobat before this all
> > started, I'm suspecting something is broken here as well.
> In what way does it fail?
Thanks, Jon, for your reply. Indeed, it was ghostscript. Also, your post
tells me to be more precise. I'll do my best next time!
Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into
your ~/.signature to help me spread!