Re: sarge?
On 2004-04-30, Kenneth Macdonald Karlsen penned:
> fre, 30.04.2004 kl. 20.25 skrev Paul Johnson:
>> Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen <ken@fiona-victor.com> writes:
>>
>> > I agree with many of the posters on slashdot. A distribution that
>> > uses a lot of focus on licencing and fanatic disputes about how the
>> > world ought to be will probably end up as "something funny that was
>> > once ago". It seems to me that foucus now is to support 11
>> > architectures (many of them are old) in sync and to
>> > remove/downgrade support for modern archtectures/ hardware. That
>> > sounds not like a sustainable environment for me.
>>
>> How about instead of grousing about how Debian sucks because the
>> release cycle is so long, *do something about it*. Start here:
>> http://www.debian.org/devel/
>
> I will do something about it and that is to stop using Debian. If i
> will develop, it would sertainly not be within Debian the community, I
> can assure you of that. I have used Debian for 3 years and my
> conclusion is to move from fantacyland to the real world, by that I
> mean the dynamic, rapid changing world of IT.
With all of those buzzwords, you should have no trouble finding a
position at any number of corporations. As near as I can tell, you've
been using Debian without understanding why Debian exists.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
--
monique
Reply to:
- References:
- sarge?
- From: "Axel Green" <axeltabs@hotmail.com>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Tim <tim.hoebeek@vub.ac.be>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Nicos Gollan <gtdev@spearhead.de>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Katipo <katipo@weavers-web.org>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen <ken@fiona-victor.com>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Kenneth Macdonald Karlsen <ken@fiona-victor.com>